As You Like It Act 5, Epilogue
As You Like It Act 5, Epilogue
Summary
Rosalind
steps forward to deliver the Epilogue, breaking the fourth wall. She playfully
acknowledges the unconventionality of a woman giving the epilogue. She claims a
good play shouldn’t need one, but then argues that good plays, like good wine
with a sign (bush), can benefit from one. Pleading she is neither a good
epilogue nor a good beggar, she instead "conjures" the audience: she
charges the women, for the love they bear men, to like the play, and charges
the men, for the love they bear women, to ensure the play pleases everyone. She
ends with a flirtatious hypothetical, stating that if she were a
woman, she would kiss all the agreeable men in the audience, and hopes those
men will applaud her in return.
Analysis
The
Epilogue is a masterful final stroke that encapsulates the play’s central
themes of gender, performance, and audience complicity.
1.
Metatheatrical
Mastery and the Unstable Self: Rosalind—the
actor—steps out of the character of Rosalind, who had just spent the play
disguised as Ganymede. This creates a layered performance: a boy actor (in
Shakespeare’s time) playing a woman (Rosalind) who played a man (Ganymede) now
speaking as a playful version of herself. This final blurring of boundaries
reminds the audience that identity is, ultimately, a performance, and that the
"magic" of the play relied on their willing suspension of disbelief.
2.
Direct
Address and Audience Complicity: By
speaking directly to the men and women in the audience, Rosalind draws them
into the final act of the play's resolution. She makes the play’s success
dependent on the same forces that drove the plot: the mutual affection between
men and women. Her charge implicates the audience in the play's world, asking
them to extend the spirit of reconciliation and goodwill from the stage into
the theater.
3.
Final
Play on Gender and Desire: The
climactic line—"If I were a woman..."—is a brilliant and cheeky joke.
It highlights the fictional construct of her own gender on the Elizabethan
stage while simultaneously teasing the audience with conditional desire. It
reinforces the play's exploration of how love and attraction transcend simple
appearances and fixed roles.
4.
Thematic
Coda on Art and Persuasion: Rosalind
dismisses the need for an epilogue only to deliver a perfect one. This mirrors
the play's own method: it dismisses artificial conventions of love and theater
even while expertly employing them. Her refusal to "beg" but instead
to "conjure" aligns with her character's agency throughout—she
commands, orchestrates, and charms, rather than pleads.
In
essence, the
Epilogue does not simply end the play; it dissolves it. It transitions the
harmony achieved on stage into the shared space of the theater, asking the
audience to seal the comic contract with their applause. Rosalind’s final words
cement her status as the play’s controlling intelligence, a charismatic guide
who has navigated the forests of identity and love and now gracefully returns
us to our own world, leaving us charmed and complicit in the illusion we just
witnessed.
Comments
Post a Comment