The Comedy of Errors Act 3 Scene 2
Act 3, Scene 2 of The Comedy of Errors
Summary
In
Act 3, Scene 2, Luciana reproaches Antipholus of Syracuse
(whom she believes is her brother-in-law) for his coldness to Adriana, advising
him to at least pretend fidelity. Antipholus S., captivated,
declares his love for Luciana herself, leaving her shocked and
confused. After she exits, Dromio of Syracuse arrives in a
panic, claiming the kitchen maid, Nell, has recognized and claimed
him as her betrothed, describing her in a grotesque, globe-trotting monologue.
Convinced
Ephesus is a land of witches, Antipholus S. sends Dromio to secure immediate
passage on any departing ship. As he resolves to flee, Angelo the
goldsmith enters and, mistaking him for Antipholus of Ephesus, gives
him the gold chain. Despite his confusion, Antipholus S. accepts the valuable
gift and heads to the mart.
Analysis
This
scene deepens the emotional and romantic stakes of the farce, while reinforcing
the Syracusans' existential disorientation. It juxtaposes high romantic poetry
with low comedy, all under the shadow of supernatural fear.
1. The
Birth of Romantic Love:
- Luciana's
Pragmatic Advice: Her
speech is ironically counterproductive. By coaching "her
brother-in-law" on how to deceive Adriana
("Apparel vice like virtue's harbinger"), she inadvertently
reveals a world of marital hypocrisy that horrifies the idealistic
stranger. Her advice is practical but morally cynical.
- Antipholus
S.'s Idealistic Declaration: His
response transforms the scene. Rejecting her cynicism, he directs a burst
of Petrarchan, worshipful love poetry toward Luciana
herself. He sees her not as a co-conspirator in deceit, but as a divine
being ("Earth’s wonder, more than Earth divine") who could
"create me new." This instant, earnest love contrasts sharply
with the troubled marriage of his twin, offering a potential new beginning
born from error.
- Dramatic
Irony: The
audience knows his love is "true" but based on a false identity.
Luciana is torn between attraction to his passionate words and horror at
their inappropriate target.
2. Low
Comedy and Bodily Terror:
- Dromio's
"Geographic" Speech: His
description of Nell as a globe is a masterpiece of comic insult and
grotesque imagery. It serves multiple purposes:
- Pure
Farce: Provides
physical humor and witty puns (Ireland in the bogs, Spain in her hot
breath).
- Social
Commentary: Highlights
the servant's vulnerability—he can be claimed as property ("such
claim as you would lay to your horse").
- Existential
Fear: Her
knowledge of his "privy marks" is the ultimate proof, for him,
of witchcraft. It's not just a joke; it's a terrifying violation of his
bodily and personal autonomy.
3. The
Witchcraft Motif Solidifies:
- Both
Syracusians now independently conclude Ephesus is supernaturally
malevolent. Antipholus S. sees Luciana as a deceptive
"mermaid" or "Siren"; Dromio sees Nell as a
transforming witch. This shared belief justifies their decision to flee.
The theme shifts from confusion to active terror and escape.
4. The
Chain of Coincidence:
- Angelo's
delivery of the chain is the linchpin of the economic plot.
Antipholus S.'s acceptance ("there's no man is so vain / That would
refuse so fair an offered chain") is a perfectly human moment of
weakness. This act will have severe consequences: it indebts him for a
chain he didn't order, and it deprives his twin of the chain he did order,
leading to Angelo's arrest and Antipholus E.'s public accusations of
dishonesty.
5.
Structural Pacing and Parallels:
- This
scene provides a breathing space between the door-locking
farce and the coming chaos, but it actively heightens tension by setting
the Syracusans on an escape trajectory that will inevitably collide with
the Ephesians.
- It
creates a parallel: both twins are now planning to
spite/escape their Ephesian "family"—Antipholus E. by gifting
the chain to the Courtesan, Antipholus S. by fleeing the country. Both
plans are derailed by the very chain that links them.
6.
Themes Enriched:
- Identity
and Transformation: Antipholus
S. feels literally remade by Luciana ("Are you a god? Would you
create me new?"). Love, like error, has the power to transform the
self.
- Appearance
vs. Reality: Luciana
advises crafting a false appearance. Antipholus S., in love, believes
Luciana's appearance (her "enchanting presence") reveals a true,
heavenly reality. Both are trapped in layers of misconception.
- Fate
vs. Agency: The
characters feel buffeted by magical forces, yet their own choices (to
lecture, to confess love, to accept the chain) propel the plot toward its
climax.
Conclusion:
Act 3, Scene 2 is a pivotal turning point where the comic errors blossom
into genuine emotional possibilities (love) and deepening
paranoia (witchcraft). It successfully blends lyrical romance with
bawdy humor, all while advancing the plot through the crucial device of the
chain. The scene confirms Ephesus as a place where identity is fluid and
external forces—whether magical or social—threaten the self, driving the
protagonists toward a desperate flight that will only ensnare them further.
Comments
Post a Comment